Key Factors Guidlines for Reviewing Certification Dc Behaviorial Health

The post-obit are a list of "pinnacle-shelf" resources that have been hand-picked past our library squad effectually this topic. If y'all would like additional research assistance on this topic, please contact our help desk. They have access to specialized databases and thousands of resources yous won't detect online. Click on a heading below to scan resources in that section.

Accordion Itemb

This Item is open in the accordion:

Evidence-Based Decision Making in Local Criminal Justice Systems

Evidence-Based Conclusion Making in Local Criminal Justice Systems

"EBDM is a strategic and deliberate method of applying empirical noesis and research-supported principles to justice organisation decisions made at the case, agency, and system level. The initiative team developed the EBDM framework, which posits that public safe outcomes will be improved when justice system stakeholders engage in truly collaborative partnerships, apply inquiry to guide their piece of work, and work together to accomplish safer communities, more efficient apply of taxation dollars, and fewer victims. The goal of [National Institute of Corrections'] Evidence-Based Decision Making Initiative is to build a systemwide framework (arrest through final disposition and belch) that will consequence in more collaborative, bear witness-based decision making and practices in local criminal justice systems. The initiative is grounded in the knowledge accumulated over two decades on the factors that contribute to criminal reoffending and the processes and methods the justice organization tin employ to interrupt this cycle of reoffensed decisions can produce more effective policy decisions, and as a result, improve outcomes for the community." Information near the NIC EBDM initiative can exist institute here. Points of admission are: habitation--introduction; framework; phases—Phase I Framework Development, Stage II Planning Process, Phase III Implementation, and Phase Iv Expansion to Statewide Structure, and Phase V - Building EBDM Capacity at the Private, Agency, and System Levels; pilot sites—links to webpages with data about each of the seven pilot sites most: the EBDM stakeholders (i.e., the vision for EBDM, the EDBM executive committee limerick, and what stakeholders in the pilot site are maxim nigh the EBDM initiative), harm reduction goals, and cloth produced by the pilot site almost EBDM in their jurisdiction; EBDM Roadmap Starter Kit—Activity i--Build a genuine, collaborative policy team; Activity 2--Build private agencies that are collaborative and in a state of readiness for modify, Activity 3--Understand current practice inside each agency and across the organisation, Activity 4--Understand and have the capacity to implement show-based practices, Activity five--Develop logic models, Activity vi--Establish operation measures, determine outcomes, and develop a system scorecard, Activity 7--Engage and gain the support of a broader set of stakeholders and the community, and Activity eight--Develop a strategic action plan for implementation; documents—"Printing Release Mesa County [CO]", "A Framework for Evidence-Based Conclusion Making in Local Criminal Justice Systems (A Work In Progress, Tertiary Edition)", and the "EBDM Readiness Checklist"; and related publications.

Implementing Evidence-Based Services [Webinar]

Implementing Evidence-Based Services [Webinar]

If yous are looking for an excellent introduction to how to implement evidence-based practices (EBPs) in your juvenile agency, then this webinar is for yous. Topics discussed include: how to identify EBPs; best proven model programs; advantages of proven EBPs; getting customer buy-in for EBP implementation; facing agency challenges during EBP adoption; key drivers; embedding EBPs in a juvenile justice agency; referral and appointment-- data drove; information collection example; analyzing family engagement barriers; family engagement strategies; EBP implementation—Inter-operability Framework; funding and sustainability; and EBP implementation in viii states.

Effective Clinical Practices in Treating Clients in the Criminal Justice System

Effective Clinical Practices in Treating Clients in the Criminal Justice System

This monograph is "intended to strengthen and improve the dissemination of bear witness-based rehabilitative technologies for offenders, inside the multidisciplinary context of correctional treatment" (p.x). Sections of this document include: executive summary; introduction — effective clinical practices and the disquisitional need for collaboration; what evidence-based practice (EBP) is; overarching principles of effective correctional treatment; mutual therapeutic factors — what works in treatment generally; specific show-based modalities for criminal justice clients; and determination—what accept we lost. At that place are four appendixes: confidentiality in correctional treatment; the separate and complementary functions of corrections and treatment; coerced treatment; and quality assurance.

Accordion Itemb

This Detail is open up in the piano accordion:

Implementing Proven Programs For Juvenile Offenders (2012)

Implementing Proven Programs For Juvenile Offenders (2012)

Evidence-based practice involves the use of scientific principles to assess the available evidence on program effectiveness and develop principles for best exercise in any detail field. In delinquency prevention or intervention this includes: assessment of community and individual client needs; review and cess of programs that could meet those needs; development and/or implementation of new programs; assignment of youth to particular programs; and monitoring of program fidelity and outcomes.

A Applied Approach to Evidence-Based Juvenile Justice Systems

A Applied Approach to Evidence-Based Juvenile Justice Systems

"This commodity presents a practical approach that JJ [juvenile justice] systems can take in achieving evidence-based programming that reduces recidivism. Nearly JJ system programs produce relatively small reductions in recidivism, on average, thus at that place is much room for comeback. A research-based approach to making programme improvements system-broad—and with that, increase the cost effectiveness of the organisation itself—is presented in this article. The success of this endeavor, however, depends on delivery of the right service to the right youth at the right time. The OJJDP Comprehensive Strategy for Serious, Tearing, and Chronic Juvenile Offenders provides the scaffolding and structured decision-making tools that tin can be used across entire juvenile justice systems for promoting effective matches between evidence-based services and offender treatment needs on an ongoing basis" (p. 1). Sections of this document include: introduction—what an evidence-based program is, and taking a proactive approach to programme improvements; a Comprehensive Strategy for Serious, Violent, and Chronic Juvenile Offenders—the OJJDP Comprehensive Strategy, the historic period-offense curve, a developmental pathways model, and risk and protective factors; key administrative tools for achieving evidence-based juvenile justice systems—the right service, to the right youth, at the right time, a system of graduated sanctions/responses, and state examples of Comprehensive Strategy benefits (N Carolina and Florida); and determination.

The Bridge to Somewhere: How Inquiry Made its Way into Legislative Juvenile Justice Reform in Ohio: A Case Written report

The Bridge to Somewhere: How Research Made its Manner into Legislative Juvenile Justice Reform in Ohio: A Instance Written report

The instrumental use of evidence-based research for influencing the passage of reform efforts affecting the juvenile justice system in Ohio is explained. "Many states beyond the state face up the challenges posed by young people in the juvenile justice system. Ohio is among the few states that has created and implemented innovative funding strategies and relied on research and evaluation to amend its approach" (p. i). Sections following an executive summary are: introduction—case report as a learning tool and overview of partners and policy modify with a focus on kid well-being; leveraging the policy window—political climate, juvenile justice landscape in Ohio pre-reform and primal stakeholders; juvenile justice as a compelling social trouble—the role of policy enquiry in making the case for reform; agenda-setting and framing solutions to "invest in what works"—using research to inform a policy reform programme; spheres of influence model—cadre team and collaborative strategy for juvenile justice policy reform; juvenile justice policies achieved within House Bill 86 reflect research-based, child evolution, and well-being perspective; and principles and implications for hereafter policy reform efforts.

Can Run a risk Assessment Improve Juvenile Justice Practices?

Can Risk Assessment Improve Juvenile Justice Practices?

"A growing number of juvenile justice experts are suggesting a new, potentially more constructive approach to reducing recidivism: starting time identify a youth's risk of re-offending; then match services to his or her specific risk factors and responsiveness to specific types of interventions. This report examined the implementation of risk/needs assessment tools in six juvenile probation offices in two states, and what effects information technology had on the practices of the probation officers" (p. 1). Sections of this brief are: background; dynamic run a risk factors for malversation; the implementation report; whether probation officers conduct chance/needs assessments reliably; whether the use of risk assessment changes juvenile probation officers' practices and perceptions of run a risk; whether the utilise of risk assessment in juvenile probation lead to changes in the fashion youth are handled; use of assessments in decision-making past juvenile probation officers; change in post-arbitrament, out-of-habitation placement rates; whether the utilize of adventure assessment changes recidivism; why sound implementation of risk cess is important; implications for policy and practice. The employ of assessments results in suitable dispositions, often at lower levels of brake. The result is better utilization of resources for high-risk youth with no increase in re-offending rates.

Drug Courts' Effects on Criminal Offending for Juveniles and Adults

Drug Courts' Effects on Criminal Offending for Juveniles and Adults

"The objective of this review is to systematically review quasi-experimental and experimental (RCT) evaluations of the effectiveness of drug courts in reducing recidivism, including drug courts for juvenile and DWI offenders. This systematic review critically assesses drug courts' effects on recidivism in the short- and long-term, the methodological soundness of the existing bear witness, and the relationship between drug courtroom features and effectiveness" (p. 6). Results are provided for: a description of eligible studies; overall mean effects by type of drug court; robustness of findings to methodological weaknesses; drug courts' long-term furnishings; features of the drug court; and additional sensitivity analysis. Overall, research shows that developed drug courts are constructive in reducing recidivism, DWI drug courts moderately successful, and juvenile drug courts having small-scale impact.

Squeeze box Itemb

This Item is open up in the accordion:

Community Supervision in a Digital World

Community Supervision in a Digital World

The changing nature of crime, along with an increase in digital literacy among the general population, has resulted in a greater number of tech-savvy individuals under community supervision. This presents unique challenges and opportunities for supervision agencies. A complete ban on supervisee access to engineering is generally non justifiable (or practical) except in the most severe circumstances. Therefore, agencies must assess and manage the hazard to public safety from supervisees' applied science use.

Accordion Itemb

Principle i. Assess Hazard and Needs

This Item is open in the accordion:

Bias In, Bias Out (2019)

Bias In, Bias Out (2019)

Law, prosecutors, judges, and other criminal justice actors increasingly utilize algorithmic adventure cess to guess the likelihood that a person will commit hereafter offense. As many scholars have noted, these algorithms tend to accept disparate racial impacts. In response, critics advocate 3 strategies of resistance: (1) the exclusion of input factors that correlate closely with race; (2) adjustments to algorithmic design to equalize predictions across racial lines; and (iii) rejection of algorithmic methods altogether.

The Most Carefully Studied, even so To the lowest degree Understood, Terms in the Criminal Justice Lexicon: Risk, Need, and Responsivity (2018)

The Most Carefully Studied, nonetheless To the lowest degree Understood, Terms in the Criminal Justice Lexicon: Risk, Need, and Responsivity (2018)

No program or intervention tin be expected to work for everyone. Providing too much or the wrong kind of services not only fails to improve outcomes, but it can brand outcomes worse by placing excessive burdens on some participants and interfering with their engagement in productive activities, like work or school. This is the foundation for a body of evidence-based principles referred to as risk, need, responsivity, or RNR (Andrews & Bonta, 2010).

Hazard Assessment in Criminal Sentencing (2016)

Chance Assessment in Criminal Sentencing (2016)

The past several years have seen a surge of involvement in using risk cess in criminal sentencing, both to reduce recidivism by incapacitating or treating loftier-hazard offenders and to reduce prison populations by diverting low-risk offenders from prison. We begin by sketching jurisprudential theories of sentencing, distinguishing those that rely on risk cess from those that preclude it. We and so narrate and illustrate the varying roles that risk cess may play in the sentencing process.

SOTIPS: Sex Offender Treatment Intervention and Progress Scale

SOTIPS: Sex Offender Treatment Intervention and Progress Calibration

"The Sex Offender Treatment Intervention and Progress Calibration (SOTIPS) is a statistically-derived dynamic measure designed to aid clinicians, correctional caseworkers, and probation and parole officers in assessing risk, treatment and supervision needs, and progress among adult males who have been bedevilled of 1 or more than qualifying sexual offenses and committed at to the lowest degree one of these sexual offenses after their 18th birthday … SOTIPS detail scores are intended to reflect an private's relative handling and supervision needs on each risk factor. The SOTIPS total score is intended to provide an estimation of an individual's overall level of dynamic adventure and need for supervision and treatment" (p. ane). Sections of this transmission include: overview and administration; item descriptions and scoring criteria; and the SOTIPS scoring sheet.

Piano accordion Itemb

Principle 2. Raise Motivation to Change

This Particular is open in the piano accordion:

Exercises for Developing MI Skills in Corrections

Exercises for Developing MI Skills in Corrections

Motivational interviewing (MI) helps clients become less ambivalent about altering their maladaptive behaviors. This publication presents "scenarios that agents normally see in their efforts to monitor and reinforce court/parole/institutional conditions and address clients' central eight criminogenic needs. This volume also considers the learning tasks of MI in relation to the viii principles for effective interventions outlined in Implementing Bear witness-Based Practice in Community Corrections: The Principles of Constructive Intervention, an NIC publication. Ordered in the sequence in which they are nearly commonly learned or mastered, the offset five of these eight tasks for learning MI provide the structure for Exercises for Developing MI Skills in Corrections." Chapters relating to these five tasks are: the spirit of motivational interviewing; active listening; recognizing and reinforcing modify talk; eliciting and strengthening change talk; and responding to resistance. A glossary of related terms is also included.

Motivational Interviewing in Corrections: A Comprehensive Guide to Implementing MI in Corrections

Motivational Interviewing in Corrections: A Comprehensive Guide to Implementing MI in Corrections

This guide explains how to implement motivational interviewing (MI) in correctional settings. Motivational Interviewing is a counseling technique that enables people to get beyond their reluctance to change trouble behaviors. MI is directive (focused on goals), client-centered, and not-confrontational. The first four chapters of this guide "address background and fundamental issues related to agency or systemwide implementation of MI … [while the final two chapters] address bureau issues, such as organizational norms, mental models, and leadership styles that can significantly affect the success of MI implementation" (p. 5). These capacity are: what MI is; how MI is learned; supervising and coaching to support implementation; assessing motivational interviewing skills; and planning to help individuals develop MI skills in a correctional setting. A glossary is too included.

Motivational Interviewing (with a Criminal Justice Focus) Annotated Bibliography

Motivational Interviewing (with a Criminal Justice Focus) Annotated Bibliography

Motivational Interviewing (MI) was introduced to the field of corrections in the 1990s through the Evidence-based Practices (EBP) Model every bit a method for enhancing intrinsic motivation. Since that time, agencies throughout the U.Due south., in all criminal justice settings, have—to a greater or lesser degree—explored if, when, and how to implement this approach to communicating, edifice rapport, and tapping into the internal motivation of the clients and staff members they work with. This annotated bibliography contains the written resources pertaining specifically to the criminal justice field. In improver, sure documents considered seminal to the preparation, implementation, evaluation, coaching, and quality assurance of MI skills are included.

Motivating Offenders to Change: A Guide for Probation and Parole

Motivating Offenders to Modify: A Guide for Probation and Parole

This publication "provides probation and parole officers and other correctional professionals with both a solid grounding in the principles behind MI [motivational interviewing] and a practical guide for applying these principles in their everyday dealings with offenders" (p.two). Vii chapters are contained in this guide: how MI fits in with show-based do; how and why people change; the motivational interviewing style; preparing for change; building motivation for change; navigating through tough times--working with deception, violations, and sanctions; and from get-go to finish--putting MI into practice.

Accordion Itemb

Principle 3. Target Interventions

This Item is open in the squeeze box:

The Adventure-Demand-Responsivity Simulation Tool (2013) (2/4)

The Adventure-Need-Responsivity Simulation Tool (2013) (two/4)

For people involved in the criminal justice arrangement, evidence-based practise (EBP) and treatments emphasize that assessment and programming should target criminal justice, criminogenic need, and other behavioral issues. The notion is that individual outcomes tin be improved by assessing for a number of related and oft overlapping dimensions such as offending (east.thou. criminal history chance), needs (e.k. hating peers, antisocial cognitions, antisocial values/thinking) and behavioral health factors (e.thou. substance employ, mental health, trauma).

Myths & Facts - Using Risk and Demand Assessments to Enhance Outcomes and Reduce Disparities in the Criminal Justice System

Myths & Facts - Using Chance and Need Assessments to Enhance Outcomes and Reduce Disparities in the Criminal Justice System

The Community Corrections Collaborative Network (CCCN) is a network comprised of the leading associations representing 90,000-plus probation, parole, pretrial, and treatment professionals around the country, including the American Probation and Parole Clan (APPA), the Association of Paroling Regime International (APAI), the Federal Probation and Pretrial Officers Clan (FPPOA), the International Customs Corrections Clan (ICCA), the National Clan of Drug Court Professionals (NADCP), the National Association of Pretrial Services Agencies (NAPSA), and the National Association of Probation Executives (NAPE).

This "Myths & Facts" packet includes a one-page list of myths and facts along with a enquiry-based supporting document to help dispel three specific myths regarding the employ of risk and demand assessments within the criminal justice system. A clarification and relevant enquiry to dispel each myth is provided. Our network believes that risk and need assessments currently provide the virtually accurate, objective prediction of the chance to recidivate. While risk and need assessments practice non predict with perfect accuracy, they guide practitioners in the field towards the nigh accurate and equitable decisions available for safely managing justice-involved individuals.

Myths & Facts - Why Incarceration Is Not the Best Way to Go on Communities Safe

Myths & Facts - Why Incarceration Is Not the Best Way to Keep Communities Condom

The Community Corrections Collaborative Network (CCCN) is a network comprised of the leading associations representing 90,000-plus probation, parole, pretrial, and handling professionals around the land, including the American Probation and Parole Clan (APPA), the Association of Paroling Authorities International (APAI), the Federal Probation and Pretrial Officers Association (FPPOA), the International Community Corrections Clan (ICCA), the National Association of Drug Court Professionals (NADCP), the National Clan of Pretrial Services Agencies (NAPSA), and the National Association of Probation Executives (NAPE). This "Myths & Facts" package includes a one-page listing of myths and facts along with a research-based supporting document to testify the effectiveness of customs corrections. This is not to suggest that prison does not play an important role in the continuum of criminal justice, but that incarceration is non e'er the best style to keep communities safety, or to break the bicycle of criminal behavior, reduce recidivism or to salvage tax payer dollars. Our network believes that each of the points in the continuum play a vital part in keeping our communities safety and that we must better sympathise through prove-based inquiry and science when to apply incarceration and when community corrections might be more constructive.

Squeeze box Itemb

Principle four. Skill Railroad train with Directed Practise

This Item is open in the accordion:

Accordion Itemb

Principle 5. Increase Positive Reinforcements

This Detail is open up in the squeeze box:

Positive Direction for Change (2010)

Positive Direction for Change (2010)

Providing incentives and rewarding specific desired behavior motivates individuals to piece of work toward long term behavior change. These strategies focus on public prophylactic, victim protection and restitution, offender accountability, consequent and effective sanctioning, addressing substance abuse issues, reducing offender unemployment and nigh critically, reducing recidivism through long term behavior modification."

State of the Art of HOPE Probation (2015)

State of the Fine art of Hope Probation (2015)

This report defines the essential elements of the Promise strategy and defines additional recommended, but not essential, elements that raise HOPE and ensure its success, and too describes in detail how the originating HOPE Probation strategy has evolved over 10 years of innovation and exercise in Honolulu, Hawaii. The experience from Honolulu's HOPE Probation provides an example for how other jurisdictions implementing Promise can adjust and adapt to changing needs and make improvements to their own HOPE strategy over fourth dimension.

HOPE Probation: Hawaii's Opportunity Probation with Enforcement

Promise Probation: Hawaii's Opportunity Probation with Enforcement

The Community Corrections Collaborative Network (CCCN) hosted a alive webinar effect with our federal partners and national and local experts to highlight Hawaii's Opportunity Probation with Enforcement (Hope), a collaborative strategy amongst the courtroom, probation, prosecutors, defense, law enforcement and community treatment providers to upshot positive behavioral changes in probationers. Hope was first conceived of by Judge Steven S. Alm of the O'ahu Offset Circuit and began equally a airplane pilot program in 2004. The HOPE strategy targets higher adventure/higher needs offenders, utilizing swift, sure, consistent, and proportionate consequences for non-compliance with probation conditions while maintaining a working alliance with the offender by both the probation officer and the gauge. Within the framework of the National Establish of Corrections' eight prove-based principles for backsliding reduction, HOPE assists offenders in the change procedure in a caring and supportive environment to aid probationers succeed on probation and in life. While seemingly a unproblematic theoretical model, HOPE is hard to do, and requires shared leadership inside the criminal justice organization. Research has shown that the Hope strategy, when done with fidelity, can exist highly successful and is inspiring like efforts in thirty-one states across the state. The CCCN believes that individual jurisdictions tin adopt the swift and sure philosophy while modifying information technology to fit the needs and resources available in local communities. Our network is committed to identifying promising and innovative practices and promoting the use of testify-based practices. Objectives for the Webinar: Showcase the innovative Hope Program and how information technology can be replicated stateside; Discuss Promise's innovative programmatic design, implementation and evaluation characteristics including HOPE's collaboration and systems approach (Court/Probation/Law Enforcement/Community Treatment Providers working together for a common goal), buy-in from staff/engagement/inclusion/supporting each other, matching probationers to the correct services instead of i-size fits all, succession planning and sustainability build to success, and research, randomized control trials, and high level scientific pattern proving the effectiveness of the plan; and engage the criminal justice organization in a alive discussion about the HOPE Program, resources for the field, how to access funding through federal resource, ideas for replication of similar approaches, and how to motivate our leaders to want to practise more.

Piano accordion Itemb

Principle 6. Engage Ongoing Community Support

This Item is open up in the squeeze box:

Accordion Itemb

Principle 7. Measure Relevant Processes & Practices

This Item is open up in the piano accordion:

WSIPP's Benefit-Cost Tool for States: Examining Policy Options in Sentencing and Corrections

WSIPP's Benefit-Cost Tool for States: Examining Policy Options in Sentencing and Corrections

The development and implementation of an belittling tool that helps states determine which evidence-based practices are almost cost effective in preventing crime and lowering correctional costs. "The project'southward overall goal is to use the best information bachelor to identify sentencing and corrections policies that can help states protect public safety and control taxpayer costs. To accomplish this goal, we accept constructed a benefit-cost "investment" model that estimates criminal offense and fiscal outcomes of different combinations of public policies" (p. one). Sections of this report that follow a summary include: background; project element i—development of the sentencing tool; project element 2—application of the tool to Washington's policy process; and projection element 3—software development and next steps.

APEX: Building the Model and First the Journey

Noon: Building the Model and Beginning the Journey

"Through extensive research and analysis, the National Institute of Corrections (NIC) is offer the field of corrections a comprehensive business model entitled the APEX (Achieving Performance Excellence) Initiative. The APEX Initiative is an agency-driven systems arroyo to edifice chapters for higher organizational performance, best practices, data-driven decisionmaking using multiple self-cess tools, and a Guidebook series with strategies, interventions, and pathways. The Noon Public Rubber Model presents a whole-systems view of a correctional agency" (p. 5). You definitely want to put this on your must read before long list! Ten chapters follow an introduction to Achieving Functioning Excellence (Apex): overview to APEX; Apex Leadership Domain; APEX Organizational Culture Domain; APEX Operations Focus Domain; APEX Stakeholder Domain; APEX Workforce Domain; APEX Strategic Planning Domain; Noon Measurement, Analysis, and Cognition Management Domain; APEX Results Domain; and developing a vii-step communications program.

Accordion Itemb

Principle 8. Measurement Feedback

This Particular is open in the accordion:

Evidence-Based Practice: Principles for Enhancing Correctional Results in Prisons

Evidence-Based Practice: Principles for Enhancing Correctional Results in Prisons

"The purpose of this paper is to introduce prison house administrators and staff to an accumulated body of knowledge regarding correctional practice to raise their direction of their prisons" (p.ane). Sections comprising this word newspaper are: introduction -- transition from prison to the customs, effective correctional do, overview of prison enquiry findings for prison classification, and summary; an overview of prison classification and risk assessment – correctional programming, guidelines, staff, and bear on; and prison realities -- organizational civilisation and priorities, staff recruitment and training, role of staff, boosted considerations (such as gangs, drugs, threats, and extortion), excellence in prison practise, implications for correctional practice, predictable goals and outcomes, integration with customs corrections, and corporate accountability. Provided as appendixes are "Viii Prove-Based Principles for Constructive Practice: Linking to Prison-Based Corrections" and "Measuring Inmate Competencies."

Accordion Itemb

This Particular is open in the squeeze box:

Drug Testing as a Condition of Supervision (2020)

Drug Testing as a Status of Supervision (2020)

The purpose of the Research in Cursory series is to evaluate popular or emerging policy and practice options pertaining to adults in the criminal justice organization to determine whether in that location is an bear witness base to support them. The briefs were written subsequently researchers reviewed the best available research on the topics in the briefs. Researchers assessed the strength of the evidence in terms of the rigor of the enquiry supporting these topics.

OJJDP Model Programs Guide

OJJDP Model Programs Guide

The Function of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention's (OJJDP'south) Model Programs Guide (MPG) contains information about evidence-based juvenile justice and youth prevention, intervention, and reentry programs. Information technology is a resources for practitioners and communities nigh what works, what is promising, and what does non work in juvenile justice, delinquency prevention, and kid protection and safety. MPG uses expert study reviewers and CrimeSolutions.gov's programme review procedure, scoring instrument, and bear witness ratings.

University of Cincinnati Corrections Establish

University of Cincinnati Corrections Constitute

UCCI is committed to the broadcasting of best practices to communities, facilities, and agencies seeking to modify offender behavior. Nosotros work with federal, country, and local governments, and with the private sector and professional organizations, to promote effective interventions and assessments for adult and juvenile offenders. Institute offerings include Technical Assistance, Staff Training, Distance Learning, and Research and Development.

NIJ's Crimesolutions.gov

NIJ'southward Crimesolutions.gov

The National Institute of Justice'south CrimeSolutions.gov is comprised of ii components — a web-based clearinghouse of programs and practices and a procedure for identifying and rating those programs and practices.

Justice Policy Heart

Justice Policy Center

Our scholars conduct research and evaluations to improve justice policy and exercise at the national, land, and local levels. We examine the evolution, implementation, and bear on of policing, crime prevention, and gang disruption initiatives. As America's prisons and jails face up unsustainable growth and dangerous overcrowding, we are finding ways to reduce the prison house population while preserving public prophylactic. And we are assessing whether new and emerging criminal justice technologies are effective, how they are used, and what their implications are for privacy and civil liberties.

Evidence-Based Practices in the Criminal Justice System: An Annotated Bibliography

Evidence-Based Practices in the Criminal Justice System: An Annotated Bibliography

"What Is the Show? Evidence-based policy and practice is focused on reducing offender risk, which in turn reduces new offense and improves public condom. Of the many available approaches to community supervision, a few core principles stand out as proven risk reduction strategies. Though non all of the principles are supported by the same weight of evidence, each has been proven to influence positive behavior change. To organize the inquiry, these core principles take been compiled… into the viii Principles of evidence-based practice in corrections. This bibliography is non a complete list of "EBP" citations, but a mere choice based on questions we receive at the Information Centre. They are organized according to: Introduction; In the Beginning; Principles 1 and 3. Assess Hazard and Needs and Target Interventions--Chance, Need, Responsivity (RNR), and Dosage; Principle 2. Heighten Motivation to Change; Principle 4. Skill Grooming with Directed Practice (CBT); Principle five. Increase Positive Reinforcement (See Incentives and Sanctions/Contingency Management); Principle 6. Engage Ongoing Community Back up; Principles vii & 8. Measure Relevant Processes and Practices and Measurement Feedback; Blueprints Programs; Caseload Size; Evaluated Programs, including Core Correctional Practices (CCP); Incentives and Sanctions/Contingency Management; Juveniles; Pretrial Services; Prisons; Sex activity Offenders; Specialized Assessment; Specialty Courts; Supervision by Risk Level; Women Offenders; Grooming Materials/Presentations; Websites; and Bureau Reports.

kavanaghyoub1968.blogspot.com

Source: https://nicic.gov/projects/evidence-based-practices-ebp

Share this post